Tefillin Photo-op?
Just wondering:
How should Jews react to a highly publicized image of a megalomaniacal traitor -- whose rogue regime recently betrayed their people to wholesale slaughter, rape, abduction; and who sacrifice the lives of young soldiers on a daily basis in an endless bloody game with a genocidal jihadi group of their own creation and bankrolling; and who recently attempted to mass murder of his own population with a lethal bioweapon masquerading as a vaccine; and who has obviously sold himself to globalist eugenicist depopulationists -- posing for a photo op wearing tefillin?
Should we acknowledge that wearing tefillin is an objectively good thing, even for a wicked man?
Should we ignore any image of that villain, since "it's forbidden to gaze at the face of a wicked person," with or without tefillin?
Should we lament the fact that a person guilty of such heinous crimes posted an image of himself wearing tefillin? Does this constitute a chillul Hashem, a public desecration of G-d's Name, since people might now associate the wearing of tefillin with villainy? Would it be like a Jewish bank robber who committed high-handed crimes and then publicized a profile photo of himself in an identifiably Jewish posture, like wearing tefillin lighting a menorah or giving tzedaka, bringing ignominy on his people and the Torah?
Should we infer a kal v'chomer: if such a lowlife can perform a mitzva like putting on tefillin, how much more so should every Jew put on tefillin?
Should we pray: may G-d Almighty Whose holy Name is inscribed in those tefillin please rescue us from the tyrant who's wearing them?
Should we hope for G-d Almighty Whose holy Name is inscribed in those tefillin to please arouse this wicked man to repent and makes amends for his incorrigible crimes? Is that even possible for someone who has sold his soul to Amalek?
All of the above?
None of the above?
Asking for a friend.
Notes:
Here's the highly publicized photo-op tefillin, in case you haven't seen it yet:
Here's an image of the said individual receiving a pair of tefillin as a gift when he served as Israel's embassador to the UN some 40 years ago, well before he betrayed his people in the most egregious of ways in October of 2023 and in the few decades leading up to it:
Source: https://anash.org/not-the-first-time-netanyahu-donned-tefillin/
YES, THIS!:
"Would it be like a Jewish bank robber who committed high-handed crimes and then publicized a profile photo of himself in an identifiably Jewish posture, like wearing tefillin lighting a menorah or giving tzedaka, bringing ignominy on his people and the Torah?"
ALSO re. con-artist-in-chief-globalist-puppet NetAnYoohoo...
A good viddeyo of recent vintage (I have some quibbles below) but mostly it paints BBGun as the war criminal he is... with a lotta Israeli evidence, some stuff I never saw before...
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/oct-7-hamas-attack-on-israel-was-100-an-inside-job-here-is-the-proof/
Quibbles w/ the above share:
1. use of "genocide" as a term--tho' I have nuttin' but ire + disgust fer the bloody massacre BBGun has inflicted on his own people an' all those livin' in Gaza, I yet don't believe "genocide" is accurate--His disregard fer human life while "takin' " territory is to be denounced an' stopped-- yet it ain't genocide imho; if every single person left Gaza (Rafah too), there would be no pursuit of these people even if they just moved ta, say, nearby Egypt. (Holocaust wuz genocide as Hitler wanted ta root us out EVERYWHERE... sadly that movement still lives, 'nuther story fer 'nuther time)
2. Pallywood--some of the images (not all) -- as are many apocryphal tales--old pix from Syrian wars reused...etc. So that's a mite dishonest. SURE Israel has it's own PR dept. an' releases its own staged photos (an' ops as we see above) I think the filmmaker here needs ta be little less trustin' of media... (ME-DIA!) to wit...
3. He claims "all" the hostages were treated "beautifully" an' "like Queens"--my air sickness bag is ready... Just (as I'll add) that many who fully deny the Holocaust cherry-pick out a few interviews from the lucky few chews who got selected fer bein' in the "showroom" division of the camps--i.e. those that got fed, gave concerts & performances, etc. ("Shoah" film outtakes...perhaps unwisely left out...) these few ladies released are trusted with the "official story." We know that fer "show" stuff exists (ta manipulate the media) an' there'z always folks that get treated differently from the rest, like the sample apartment with no vermin or drips or leaks.
Just as on any given tour of Bellevue (or similarly shameful "insty-2-shuns" of mental health treatment...) they'll show ya the few nice clean zen'd out folks playin' chess--not the screamin' drugged up abused patients gettin' molested (yes at Bellevue!) in rooms with feces an' other fluids on the walls. So this filmmaker either is too pro-hamas ta "see" that even if these former hostage were tellin' the truth--that duz not mean the others were treated like "Queens." Some other women gave testimony an' say they were raped, starved, hit, an' worse--I believe them too! One had ta have new arm surgery as she had a break not set. Also, we know that if you've just been lucky 'nuff ta have yer own life spared from rotten terrorists (even if Israel funded 'em I would still say Hamas are not nice guys ta have tea with...), it's likely you got told ta "hush up" about any abuses 'er they'd find ya where ya lived an' slit yer throats. (I know, graphic, but these are "head hunters") I'm not near-sure these folks were well-treated tho'-- that ol' lady in the film looks near-starved--I'm near sure they said whatever (like Patty Hearst!) ta save their own skins... an' mebbe that of their children... perhaps later they recanted by the MSM moves on...fast!
4. tho he clarifies that the ordinary "chews" are not to be held full-out guilty fer these crimes against humanity--he blames "The Rothschilds" an' claims that this one fambly runs the USA, Israel, the UK an' so much more... Oy. He doesn't seem ta know Rothchilds are not in charge--they're the bagment an' bankers of the Vatty-kin, Black Nobility / 13 Famblies, an' the Committee of 300 (most of which ain't MOTs)... I don't think that take is helpful as it targets one fambly alone as an easy scapegoat...
5. he tags the kibbutzim as hated commies--c'mon now--Israel has been a capitalist country since the 1970s if not earlier--life on a kibbutz is only communal in a type of living style that doesn't bother anyone--some vestige of the former socialist "ideas" that did come from the USSR perhaps, but nobody would pull out a little red book there... methinks it wuz ruther a matter of folks in one spot (aka a good target). Easy ta corner! Ditto fer the festival people--from all I gather it was not (as portrayed) some pagan-satanic-sex-n-drugs love fest ta be stamped out by the now-holier-than-thou BB... (some "truthers" have said they were satanists and deserved all they got--oy) but I think ANY large gatherin'--concert, stadium--like so many OPS 'round the world--is how ya make a target--be it in Las Vegas or Russia or....Israel. My guess--this fest wuz a mix of secular an' reformed, many beautiful youths gathered for joy (simcha!) an' not some nest of iniquity... imho the operative words were a) many an' b) convenience...
6. he claims that only 28 people were possibly killed "by accident" by Hamas--all the others killed by Israel's "friendly fire" an' (term not used by implied) Hannibal directive... He claims no Hamas members killed innocent jews--that only the Israelis did. Now he denies all that go-pro footage of Hamasians cheerin'? C'mon. I cain't say if 1200 or 1500 is the number but I DO think that they let those boys "go fer broke"--I think it was more 'n 50 young men from Hamas--but 50 kin do a lotta real life damage. I've heard very credible stories (eg. Norman Fenton's nice) that what they sawr was real--there are many tales of just how women are treated by not just Hamas but many of these men of the "noble faith" (per Gad Saad's terminology...)... so this filmmaker sayin' that Hamas wouldn't hurt a hair on these women's heads is ABSURD (we see Swedish women, English women, French women as livin' or dead testimony to the contrary)
BUT ALL THAT SAID--some of the evidence is incontrovertible--highly wreck-o-mended in spite of all this "baggage" BEYOND an' Inside Job
With that said, blessin's on all these an' other whistleblowers fer tellin' the truth--I hope BBGun doesn't touch a hair on their heads (like I trust the gubbamint there not ta destroy whistleblowers?)
They totally pernted their fingers at BBGun & CO... correctly--but they fail ta see that BB is just a puppet--a larger target is his masters. Either way, he's one'a the worst "chews" in history--makin' bank robbers look tame!
LAST "QVESTION"...
Who are young IDF who bombed / harmed their own--who didn't say no an' lobbed grenades inta the kibbutzes? who shot at their own from hell-o-copters? THIS is hard ta fathom... are they like the "good Germans?"
Maybe we missed the video part where he was asking several times if for sure there were parchments in the tefillin boxes, like he was concerned when he got the shot video.